SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 742

SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Girijala Simhachalam S/o Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Babuji Tenneti.
For the Respondent: Pulipati Radhika.

ORDER :

1. One who seeks equity must do equity. A person who comes to the Court to seek equity should come with clean hands.

2. The above writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

    “… to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 6th respondent in conducting tender cum open auction in respect of S.No.267, Ac.3.53 cents and S.No.282/1, Ac.5.80 cents, total Ac.9.33 cents (but on ground Ac.8.33 cents) of Bhimadole village and Mandal, Eluru District belongs to 6th respondent Choultry during subsistence of lease period of petitioner till 21.06.2024, is illegal, arbitrary, without following due process of law, principles of natural justice, apart from violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to stay all further proceedings dated 26.06.2023 issued by 6th respondent for tender cum open auction in respect of S.No.267, Ac.3.53 cents and S.No.282/1, Ac.5.80 cents, total Ac.9.33 cents (but on ground Ac.8.33 cents) of Bhimadole village and Mandal, Eluru District … …”

3....

    (a) The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that petitioner is successful bidder in the auction held on 21.06.2021, conducted by 6th respondent for a period of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top