V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Medepalli Madhusudhana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Patibanda Venkata Subba Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A dispute between tenant and a landlord is involved in this Second Appeal preferred under Section 100 CPC by the tenant and respondent is the landlord.
2. Landlord filed O.S.No.143 of 2013 before learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur seeking for eviction of defendant/tenant from the plaint schedule property and for delivery of vacant possession of this property to the plaintiff with a direction to the defendant/tenant to pay Rs.1,000/- per day towards damages for use and occupation from the date of suit till the date of eviction and for costs and such other reliefs. After due trial, the suit was dismissed by judgment dated 10.12.2015.
3. Plaintiff/landlord preferred A.S.No.117 of 2016. This was heard by learned XII Additional District Judge-Cum-Family Court, Guntur and after considering the submissions on both sides and on considering the material on record, the learned first appellate Court found merit in the appeal and as a consequence, it set aside the judgment of the trial Court and granted the relief of eviction and recovery of possession but refused to grant the damages prayed for. It granted two months time to the tenant to vacate the premises.
4. It is agai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.