SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 906

K. MANMADHA RAO
Yedida Challa Rao – Appellant
Versus
B. Ravindranadh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: T.D. Pani Kumar.
For the Respondent: G.V.S. Kishore Kumar.

ORDER:

1. This Contempt case has been filed to punish the contemnor/respondent under the provisions of Contempt of courts Act 1971 for violation of the orders and for not implementing the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 2549 of 2020 dated 30.06.2022.

2. Heard Sri T.D. Phani Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri G.V.S. Kishore Kumar, learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondent.

3. This Court, vide order, dated 30.06.2022, in W.P. No. 2549 of 2020, has disposed of the writ petition. The operative portion of the same, as under:

    “......Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of setting aside the proceedings vide R.O.C. No. 6341(2)/2019 (C.Sec), dated 28.11.2019 cancelling the appointment order of the petitioner vide R.O.C. No. 3/2019/C(2), dated 01.06.2019 issued by the respondent No. 3. Further, the respondent No. 3 is directed to reconsider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the Rules, by taking into consideration the material produced by the petitioner, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits tha


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top