SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Piridi Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
G. Murali Krishna – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. V. S. MEHAR KUMAR
For the Respondent: D. RAVI KIRAN

JUDGMENT :

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.

Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 23.11.2016 of the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Guntur passed in M.V.O.P.No.432 of 2013, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the claim against the 2nd respondent-Insurance Company, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants.

2. Facts germane to dispose of the appeal may briefly be stated as follows:

The appellants are the claimants in M.V.O.P.No.432 of 2013. They are the wife, progeny and mother of late Piridi Apparao. On 11.03.2013, about 7.00 a.m., when Apparao was going on his motorcycle from his house to attend his duty, as a fireman in Fire Station of Pamarru, and when he reached near Anjaneya Swamy Temple of Gudiwada on NH-165, a Van bearing No.AP 37 X 3736 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed the motorcycle, on which, Apparao was going. He sustained injuries in the said accident and succumbed to the said injuries while undergoing treatment in Primary Health Centre, Pamarru.

3. A case in Crime No.50 of 2013 of Pamarru Police Station was registered under Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “I.P.C.”) again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top