SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K. MANMADHA RAO
Patnam Ramanaiah (died) – Appellant
Versus
Patnam Subba Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri T.C. Krishnan
For the Respondents: Sri V. Roopesh Kumar Reddy

ORDER :

As the issue involved in both the civil revision petitions is one and the same, they are being taken up for hearing as well as disposed of by way of this Common Order.

2. Heard Mr. T.C. Krishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. V. Roopesh Kumar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner brought up the respondent and 2nd defendant and got them educated and employed in Government service. But the respondent filed the suit in O.S.No.115 of 2005 for partition with false allegations. The 4th defendant is his second wife. Himself and 2nd defendant and 4th defendant engaged an advocate and got filed vakalat. The petitioner sustained fracture in the year 2005 and getting treatment by that time. His wife who is the 4th defendant in the suit was also attacked with heart ailment and brain hemorrhage and getting treatment. Since the respondent and 2nd defendant including the daughters of the petitioner did not choose to look after them or get any treatment for them, the 2nd petitioner is attending to serve them during treatment. The wife of the petitioner died and he came to know that preliminary decre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top