Back
V. SRINIVAS, D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU
Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Retired Steel Executives Association – Respondent
ORDER :
D.V.S.S.Somayajulu, J
With the consent of both the learned counsel, this Writ Appeal itself has been taken up for hearing.
2) This Court has heard Sri W.V.Srinivas, learned senior counsel, on behalf of Sri K. Sarva Bhouma Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, and Sri C. Raghu, the learned senior counsel for the 1st respondent and Sri N. Harinath, learned Deputy Solicitor General appearing for the 2nd respondent.
3) This Writ Appeal is filed questioning the order of the learned single Judge, dated 20.09.2022, passed in W.P.No.6794 of 2022.
4) For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as writ petitioner and respondents 1 to 4; as they are arrayed in the Writ Petition.
5) Sri W.V.Srinivas, learned senior counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 4 (present appellants) has argued the matter. According to him there are two schemes provided by the respondent company i.e., Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (for short “RINL”), for its retired employees, one is Group Mediclaim Insurance Scheme and the other is Post Retirement Medical Scheme (PRMS). It is his contention that the new scheme that was introduced by virtue of the Circular No. 2 of 2022 is more beneficial to the retir
Welfare schemes must be interpreted pro-employee, and retired employees should have the option to choose the scheme that is more beneficial or affordable.
Employees have the right to switch from CPF to GPF cum Pension Scheme if they applied before retirement, as established by precedent.
Delay and latches in challenging the seniority is always fatal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
