IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. SESHA SAI, DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA, JJ.
Jayapal Reddy Gudipati Kakinada Government General Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Goods and Services Tax Officer Jagannayakpur – Respondent
Writ Petition No.36794 of 2022
Decided on : 15-11-2022
Cancellation of Registration - Goods and Services Tax - Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The petitioner, a diet contractor, challenged the cancellation of registration by the Goods and Services Tax Officer. The petitioner contended that the supplies made to Government General Hospitals are classifiable as Restaurant Services taxable at 5% under the GST Act. The petitioner also highlighted the delay in filing monthly returns due to non-receipt of bills from the government and non-payment for the services provided. The court disposed of the Writ Petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the appellate authority as per Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, within a week from the date of receipt of the order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a diet contractor, challenged the cancellation of registration by the Goods and Services Tax Officer, citing delays in filing monthly returns and non-payment for services provided to Government General Hospitals.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the Writ Petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the appellate authority as per Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, within a week from the date of receipt of the order.
Issues: Challenge to cancellation of registration under the CGST Act, 2017, due to delays in filing monthly returns and non-payment for services provided to Government General Hospitals.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the availability of the appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, for persons aggrieved by decisions or orders passed under the Act.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to approach the appellate authority as per Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, within a week from the date of receipt of the order.
ORDER :
A.V. Sesha Sai, J.
1. Heard Sri P. Karthik Ramana, Learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.C.D. Sekhar, learned Government Pleader for State of Andhra Pradesh for Respondent Nos.1 and 3, Sri N. Harinath, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India and Sri Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.4.
2. An order of cancellation of registration passed by the Goods and Services Tax Officer, Jagannayakpur-1st respondent herein, dated 01.02.2022 under the provisions of Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition. According to the petitioner, he is a diet contractor, carrying on contracts with the Government General Hospitals for supply of food to the in-patients at the subsidized price fixed by the State Government. Preceded by a show-cause notice dated 06.12.2021, the first respondent herein issued the impugned cancellation order dated 01.02.2022. It is absolutely not in controversy that in response to the show-cause notice issued by the first respondent, the petitioner herein did not file any reply/explanation. However, at paragraphs 3 and 4 of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, the following reasons are shown by the petitioner:
4. In these circumstances, the Petitioner could not file the Returns for the tax periods from May, 2021 to January, 2022 within the prescribed time. The GST network is so designed that a taxable person will be able to file monthly Returns in Form GSTR-3B only if he is prepared to discharge the tax liability along with interest, if any generated. The GST network does not allow to file the returns declaring the tax liability and discharge the liability along with interest at a later date. Further, until the prior months returns are filed, the filing of Returns for the subsequent period does not arise.”
3. It is also pertinent to extract paragraph 7 of the Affidavit:
Availability of appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, for persons aggrieved by decisions or orders passed under the Act.
The importance of providing detailed reasons for cancellation of registration and the need for compliance with the principles of natural justice.
The court quashed the cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of returns, emphasizing consistency in judicial precedents and due process for compliance obligations.
Cancellation of GST registration should be exercised with circumspection, especially considering the impact of the Covid pandemic on business operations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.