SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1375

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Yarlagadda Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Criminal Revision Case is preferred against the impugned judgment in Criminal Appeal No.149 of 2008 on the file of the learned V Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur dtd. 5/6/2009 confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.289 of 2006 on the file of the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur dtd. 17/4/2008 convicting the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, 'the N.I. Act') and sentencing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four months and to pay fine of Rs.500.00, in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for one month.

2. The revision petitioner herein was the accused and the Respondent No.2 was the complainant before the trial Court. The Respondent No.1 is pro forma party, the State represented by Public Prosecutor.

3. Case of the Complainant

3.1. The complainant approached the Court by filing a private complaint stating that the accused borrowed an amount of Rs.70,000.00 from him on 10/4/2004 and executed a promissory note in his favour agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

3.2. Thereafter, accused issued a cheque dtd. 19/7/2005 f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top