SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1344

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Mannam Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Accused in Sessions Case No.06 of 2013 on the file of the learned Special Judge Constituted under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act-cum-I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur [for short, "trial Court"], is the appellant herein. He was tried for the offence punishable under Sec. 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [for short, "POCSO Act"] and Sec. 506(2) of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 [for short, "IPC"].

2. Vide Judgment, dtd. 29/9/2015, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the Accused under Sec. 235(2) of Cr. P.C. Accordingly, he was sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for Ten (10) Years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) for the offence punishable under Sec. 6 of the POCSO Act. However, the accused was acquitted under Sec. 235(1) of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sec. 506(2) of IPC.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

4. Considering the nature of the crime, I am not disclosing the names of victim, members of her family, as well as the witnesses of that area (locality); therefore, wherever required, they have been described by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top