SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1468

V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Shaik Kalesha – Appellant
Versus
B. Sreenivasa Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mekala Rama Murthy, Advocate, Maheswara Rao Kunchem, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J. - Aggrieved by the impugned order dtd. 19/3/2012 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- V Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Ongole, passed in M.V.O.P.No.368 of 2010, whereby the Tribunal has partly allowed the claim against the respondents 2 to 6, the instant appeal is preferred by the appellants/ claimants for enhancement of claim amount.

2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim application.

3. The claimants filed a Claim Petition under Sec. 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the respondents praying the Tribunal to award an amount of Rs.4, 00, 000.00 towards compensation on account of death of deceased Shaik Khadar Bee in a Motor Vehicle Accident occurred on 12/7/2007.

4. Facts germane to dispose of this appeal may be briefly stated as follows:

Petitioners 1 and 2 are the sons and petitioner No.3 is daughter of Smt Shaik Khadar Bee, hereinafter referred to as 'deceased'. The deceased and her husband went to Hyderabad to their relatives house and when they were at Hyderabad, they heard about the death of their relative by name Masthan Vali. On 12

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top