SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 181

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Nimmanapalli Chandrakala – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, Advocate, K.Dhanamjaya Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The instant petition under Sec. 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, [in short 'Cr.P.C'] has been filed, by the petitioners/A.3 and A.4, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in C.C.No.106 of 2019 on the file of the Court of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Proddatur, which was registered for the offence punishable under Sec. 498-A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [in short, 'I.P.C.'] and Ss. 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, [in short, 'D.P.Act'] .

2. Petitioners herein are Accused Nos.3 and 4 in the above C.C and Petitioner No.1 is the sister-in-law of Respondent No.2/de facto complainant and Petitioner No.2 is the husband of Petitioner No.1.

3. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows:

a. The marriage of the de facto complainant was performed with Accused No.1 on 22/11/2010 according to Hindu rites and customs. At the time of marriage, the parents of the de facto complainant presented 22 tulas of gold ornaments to Accused No.1, towards dowry. Accused No.1 was then working as Staff Assistant in D.C.C.Bank, Kamalapuram. During wedlock, de facto complainant gave birth to a male and a female child. Accused Nos.1 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top