SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1447

V. SRINIVAS
Pingal Mallika – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Posani Venkateswara Rao, Advocate, P.Sai Surya Teja, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Assailing the judgment dtd. 29/11/2010 in Crl.A.No.421 of 2010 on the file of Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Judge, Family Court, Guntur, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the calender and judgment dtd. 13/8/2010 in C.C.No.627 of 2007 on the file of Court of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Special Mobile Magistrate), Guntur, for the charges under Sec. 342 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and Sec. 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (hereinafter referred to as "ITP Act"), the petitioner/accused No.1 filed the present criminal revision case under Sec. 397 r/w.401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.").

2. The revision case was admitted on 21/3/2011 and the sentence of imprisonment was suspended vide orders in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1016 of 2011.

3. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is as follows: Accused No.1 is a Mobile Beautician by profession. On the deceitful words said to be made by the accused No.1 to P.W.1, L.Ws.2 and 3, they believed that she would provide better jobs for them at Bangalore and she asked P.W.1 and others to come to her house. For which, on 19/9/20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top