SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1241

RAVI NATH TILHARI
Radha Krishna Sarma Chitta – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.A.Ramachandra Murthy, Advocate, A.Veeraswamy, Advocate

Table of Content
1. common issues concerning gratuity payments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of writ petitions filed for gratuity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. petitioners argue entitlement under gratuity act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. respondent's defense regarding applicability of gratuity act. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. the government's position on authority roles in gratuity payments. (Para 18 , 19)
6. determination of eligibility and service requirements. (Para 20 , 21)
7. gratuity entitlement based on continuous service. (Para 22 , 24)
8. interpretation of welfare legislation principles. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
9. service prior to notification counts toward gratuity. (Para 32 , 33 , 44)
10. court's directive on gratuity payment terms. (Para 56 , 58)

JUDGMENT

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J. - These writ petitions involve common question of law and pertain to the same Educational Institution namely D.M.S.S.V.H. College of Engineering, Machilipatnam, Krishna District (in short, the Educational Institution).

2. The petitioner(s) in W.P.Nos.25019 of 2011, 30226 of 2012, 4078 of 2013 and 12576 of 2014 are the Employees of the Educational Institution and have filed the writ petition for direction to make the payment of gratu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top