SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 258

TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
B. V. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.Aswartha Narayana, Advocate, Ganduri Nageswara Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The 2nd respondent in the Criminal Petition is the wife of the 1st petitioner/respondent. The 2nd respondent herein filed Domestic Violence Case No.7 of 2014 that she was subjected to domestic violence by all the respondents in D.V.C case and prayed to return Rs.10, 00, 000.00 Rs.10, 00, 000.00 and 50 tulas of gold considered to be Sridhana given as dowry to the petitioners/respondents; to allow her into house of the 1 st petitioner/respondent on par with her husband; to pay an amount of Rs.6000.00 towards rent; not to commit further domestic violence; and also directed to pay compensation of Rs.10, 000.00 per month for unreunionment of life of the 2nd respondent.

2. On receiving notices from the Court, the respondents in Domestic Violence Case, have made their appearance and later they have remained exparte. Therefore, the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court at Anantapuramu, was constrained to allow the D.V.C. No.7/2014, as prayed for by an order dtd. 27/12/2016.

3. Assailing the said order in D.V.C. No.7 of 2014, dtd. 27/12/2016, the respondents in the DVC who are petitioners herein have filed Criminal Appeal No.98 of 2018 on the file of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top