SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1272

K. MANMADHA RAO
Sikendar – Appellant
Versus
Syed Bavafakruddin – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.Venu Gopal Rao, Advocate, E.Sambasiva Prathap, Advocate, Mdsaleem, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dtd. 18/2/2010 passed in A.S.No.14 of 2011 on the file of the Court of VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Madanapalle, in reversing the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.295 of 2008 dtd. 18/2/2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.

2. For convenience the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed before the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Madanapalle, in A.S.No.14 of 2011 (for short "the first appellate Court").

3. Originally, the suit in OS No.295 of 2008 was filed by the plaintiff before the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, for grant of mandatory injunction and for delivery of possession of the suit schedule property. It is contended by respondent/plaintiff that his father Dasthagiri Sab along with his two brothers Reddy Sahebpeer Saheb Reddy Sulaiman Saheb filed a suit in O.S No.314 of 1943 on the file of District Munsif Court, Madanapalle for declaration and permanent injunction against Syed Yakub Saheb and his brothers. The said suit was decreed in favour of the father of the plaintiff. It is also held in the sai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top