SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1281

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Boya Gopal – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Criminal Revision Case is preferred against the concurrent judgments of conviction and sentence passed against the petitioners/A.1 and A.2 for the offences punishable under Sec. 7 (A) r/w 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995 in C.C.No.308 of 2006, which was confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2007 dtd. 22/7/2008, wherein the petitioners are sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10, 000.00, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of three months.

2. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that on 23/6/2006 on information about illegal transportation of arrack sachets across the border of Karnataka State, the Inspector of Prohibition and Excise, Yemmiganur, along with police officials and excise staff proceeded to the road leading from Yemmiganur to Malapalli village i.e., near L.L.C. Canal Culvert, and found the accused along with three plastic sacks containing 200 arrack sachets of 100ml each.

3. The Excise Inspector for the purpose of analysis collected samples under Mos. 1 to 3. The remaining sacks were seized under the PanchanaEX.P.1., basing on which, a crime was registered under E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top