SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 246

V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
B. Mareppa Yadav – Appellant
Versus
N. Balaiah – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The appeal is filed by the defendant in O.S.No.173 of 2005 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kurnool. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in the said suit.

2. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The brief averments in the plaint are as follows: On 10/5/2002, the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.3, 00, 000.00 and agreed to repay with future interest at 24% per annum and executed the suit pronote in favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, in spite of repeated oral demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to repay the debt. On 16/4/2005, the plaintiff got issued a legal notice and the same was received by the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the debt nor give a reply. The defendant is not an agriculturist and therefore claimed the agreed rate of interest. Hence, the suit.

4. The defendant filed a written statement contending that he approached the plaintiff on 8/5/2002 for a loan of Rs.3, 00, 000.00 for his partnership business. The plaintiff agreed to lend money at 24% per annum. On 10/5/2002, the plaintiff wanted him to give a D.P. Note for Rs.3, 00, 000.00 and after scribing the pronote, he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top