VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Telikapalli Padmavathi – Appellant
Versus
State Station House Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant petition under Sec. 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[in short 'Cr.P.C'] has been filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.2 seeking to quash F.I.R.No.397 of 2019 of Arundelpet P.S., which was registered for the offence punishable under Sec. 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.[In short, 'I.P.C.']
2. The facts which led to the filing of this petition are;
a. It is the case of the de-facto complainant that Accused Nos., 1 and 2 advised him to purchase the house site plots in the firm of A1 viz., Sai Krishna Town Ships (India) Pvt. Limited in the name of his daughters. It is stated that he purchased the said plots for a total amount of Rs.5, 05, 000.00. When he called upon to register the plots, A1 kept on dragging the issue on one or other pretext, deceiving him fraudulently and inducing him to remit the amounts. It is his case that A2 also co-operated with her husband in cheating the de-facto complainant. Initially, de-facto complainant approached the police on 25/7/2018 and lodged a complaint, but they have not taken any action. Then approached the Superintendent of Police on 29/10/2018, but as all efforts failed, he filed a private complaint bef
Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Golconda Linga Swamy
Thermax Ltd.v.K.M.Johny and others
Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi [(1976) 3 SCC 736 : 1976 SCC (Cri) 507]
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.