Back
K MANMADHA RAO
P. Suryakumari – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary To Govt – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
Relinquishment of promotion rights under service rules does not permanently bar future promotions if not explicitly stated as irrevocable.
Established seniority lists must be adhered to unless timely objections are raised; age considerations alone do not override settled seniority.
Temporary work arrangements or in-charge positions do not confer the right to claim promotion on par with juniors, and regular promotions should be granted following the rules and procedures.
The promotion of an employee without prior notice or hearing violates principles of natural justice, rendering such actions void and unenforceable.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Rule 47[2] and its application to the petitioner's relinquishment, emphasizing the distinction between temporary and perma....
Denial of promotion as arbitrary when a prior penalty is set aside; principles of natural justice require due consideration of relevant orders.
Rule 28 of the A.P. State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 does not permanently extinguish an employee's right to be considered for promotion, in line with fundamental rights under Article 16(1) of ....
Promotion cannot be claimed as a matter of right by an employee, but consideration for promotion is a Fundamental Right.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
