Back
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Kadiyala Sudhakar Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER:
1. This writ petition is filed claiming the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:
3. Petitioner herein has applied for passport vide application reference No.ARN24-1010414319 to the 2nd respondent on 04.09.2024. Then, the 2nd respondent has issued a letter dated 12.09.2024 calling for clarification for issuance of the passport to the petitioner. For which, the petitio
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and the denial of a passport based on a non-pending criminal case is unconstitutional.
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and passport issuance cannot be denied solely based on pending criminal cases without proper legal basis.
The mere pendency of criminal proceedings does not justify the denial of passport issuance, reaffirming the right to personal liberty and travel under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Passport issuance or renewal is contingent upon production of orders from the concerned Court permitting the applicant to depart from India when a criminal case is pending before a Court.
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and passport renewal cannot be denied solely based on pending criminal cases without proper legal justification.
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and passport renewal cannot be denied solely based on pending criminal cases without prior court cognizance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
