Back
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Gajjala Venkata Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
2. Averments, in brief, in
The court established that a vacancy in the Chairperson's position can be filled for the remaining term under Section 6(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Women's Commission Act, not as a new appointment under....
Petitioner cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate.
Petitioner cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment made under Article 316(1) is complete and removal requires adherence to Article 317. The court held that the recall of the app....
The court directed the government to fill the vacant ST category position in the Andhra Pradesh State Food Commission, emphasizing eligibility without gender restriction under the National Food Secur....
A writ of mandamus requires the existence of a legal right and corresponding duty, which was not established by the petitioners.
Inordinate delay and suppression of facts in seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution bar the petitioner from obtaining the desired remedy.
Mere recommendations in the selection process do not confer a right to appointment; the state exercises discretion in final appointments based on administrative necessity.
"Doctrine of Pleasure" has its genesis under common law - A public servant could be dismissed from service by Crown at its pleasure.
Failure to follow procedural requirements by the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women invalidated their actions and recommendations, allowing the writ petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
