Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
V. SRINIVAS
Vijay Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. By Its PP Hyd. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
V. Srinivas, J.
Assailing the judgment dated 06.08.2008 in G.S.C.No.112 of 2007 on the file of the Court of learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam, convicted the accused, on his admission, for the offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”), the petitioner/accused filed the present criminal revision case under Section 397 r/w.401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
2. The revision case was admitted on 18.08.2008 and the sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner was suspended, vide orders in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.1667 of 2008.
3. The shorn of necessary facts are that :
(ii). Based on the complaint of de facto complainant, Gajuwaka police register a c
A conviction based on an admission of guilt is valid unless there is clear evidence of unsoundness of mind affecting the accused's capacity to understand the nature of the act.
Inconsistencies in the evidence and failure to properly appreciate the material on record can lead to a manifest error of law, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving resulting in death, affirming the sufficiency of evidence while reducing the sentence to one year based on mitigating circumstances.
The appellate court's modification of conviction from Section 307 to Section 324 IPC was justified due to insufficient evidence of grievous injury, upheld by the revisional court.
The court affirmed that credible eyewitness testimony can establish guilt in negligence cases, and concurrent findings by lower courts are generally upheld unless proven otherwise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the nature of injuries, the lack of expert medical opinion, and the maximum punishment under Section 337 of the IPC in determi....
The court established that intent and overt acts are crucial for conviction under Section 307 IPC, and injuries need not be fatal to support a charge of attempted murder.
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving causing death but reduced the sentence to one month, considering mitigating circumstances and the time elapsed since the incident.
Conviction under Section 324 IPC upheld based on evidence, while the charge under Section 307 IPC was invalidated due to lack of intent, leading to a reduced sentence based on the time elapsed since ....
The judgment reinforces that consistent witness testimony and absence of material contradictions are sufficient to uphold a conviction in criminal cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article