Back
K SURESH REDDY, K SREENIVASA REDDY
Mannuru Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.Sreenivasa Reddy, J.
Accused No.1 in Sessions Case No.334 of 2011 on the file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kadapa (for brevity ‘learned Additional Sessions Judge’), is the sole appellant.
2. Charge sheet was filed against accused Nos.1 to 8 for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 324, 307, 302, 307 read with 149 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’). Pending trial, accused Nos.3 and 6 died and case against them was abated.
3. Vide Judgment, dated 24.10.2016, the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused No.1 of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and shall also pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only), in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two (02) months for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. A1 was found not guilty of the other charges and accordingly he was acquitted of the other charges. The other accused were found not guilty of the charges levelled against them and accordingly, they were acquitted of the said charges.
4. The substance of the charges as against
The court established that a single blow without intent to kill does not meet the threshold for murder under IPC Section 302, warranting a conviction for grievous hurt instead.
Instigation alone does not establish culpability for murder if the accused did not directly participate in the act of violence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for reliability and consistency in witness testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doub....
Instigation alone does not establish guilt for murder if the accused did not directly participate in the act leading to death.
The judgment underscores the principle that an acquittal should not be overturned without compelling evidence, emphasizing the importance of consistent and reliable witness testimonies in criminal ca....
Peritonitis as defined in medical dictionary is as under: “inflammation of the peritoneum, typically caused by bacterial infection either via the blood or after rupture of an abdominal organ”.
It is the quality and not the quantity which determines the adequacy of evidence. Evidence has to be weighed not counted.
Prosecution must substantiate charges with reliable evidence; significant discrepancies in witness statements and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
In cases where a single blow is inflicted with a blunt object, without an intention to cause death, the offense may be scaled down from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting....
Prosecution must substantiate charges beyond reasonable doubt; intentional murder requires proof of intent, while culpable homicide may be established through knowledge of likely fatality.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
