V. SUJATHA
Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chairperson-cum-presiding Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
V.Sujatha, J.
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
2. The 2nd petitioner herein is the Regional manager of the 1st petitioner company at Kurnool, which deals with business of vehicle finance. The 2nd respondent herein used to work as a Senior Credit Executive in the petitioner company, whose duties are to supervise the employees working under him and has got a power to take independent decisions relating to the collection of amounts from customers who had taken finance from the petitioner company. The petitioner used to get a monthly salary of Rs.15,250/-.
3. The case of the petitioners is that though the 2nd respondent was transferred from Kurnool to Adoni branch office vide letter dated 01.03.2012 due to administrative re
Management of M/S May and Baker (India) Ltd. Vs. Workmen AIR 1967 SC 678
The burden of proof regarding the status of an employee as a 'workman' lies with the employee, not the employer, as per the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court ruled that a workman who performs supervisory duties and earns above the statutory salary limit does not qualify as a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, rendering the Tribunal's a....
The definition of 'Workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act excludes those in supervisory roles who exceed statutory salary limits, impacting jurisdiction over disputes.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and its application to the case at ha....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 2(s)(iv) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, regarding the definition of a 'workman' and the requirement for follow....
The court established that the classification of an employee as a 'workman' depends on the nature of their duties rather than their job title or designation.
The unlawful termination of service without complying with statutory procedures mandates reinstatement and full back wages for the workman under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to focus on the primary and predominant duties of a person in determining their status as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, 194....
The determination of whether an employee is a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act is based on the actual duties performed, emphasizing that titles or managerial roles do not exclude individuals....
The court ruled that employees in managerial roles and earning above Rs.10,000 do not qualify as 'workmen' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, reversing the Labour Court's decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.