Back
V. SUJATHA
D. Shafiulla – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
V. Sujatha, J.
The present Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.319 of 2018 of Gooty Police Station, Ananthapuram District.
2. The brief facts of the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the accused No.3 in FIR No.319 of 2018 of Gooty Police Station, Ananthapuram District, which was registered against the petitioner and two others, for the offences punishable under Section 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)and (s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (POA) Amendment Act, basing on a complaint said to have been lodged by the 2nd respondent/ defacto complainant. The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the same against the petitioner.
3. The allegation against the accused as per the contents of the complaint is that the 2nd respondent is working as Manager in Sevaghad Sant Sri Senal Maharaj and Jagadamba Matha Temple and on 01.12.2018 at about 12.00 noon at Sevaghad, Cherlopalli village, Gooty Mandal, the accused-Basheer Ahammad and Issaq were working in the land, which was agreed to be purchased by the Trust of the said temple, the 2nd respondent/complainant went there
The court established that insufficient evidence and lack of specific allegations can justify quashing of FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC.
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute offences under IPC or SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie grounds for prosecution.
The court quashed proceedings against petitioners as allegations did not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the need for prima facie grounds for prosecution.
The court established that inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC can quash proceedings lacking sufficient evidence or motivated by malice.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the misuse of the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and to discourage dis....
The court quashed criminal proceedings against the accused, determining that the allegations were civil in nature and lacked prima facie evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
The court emphasized the need for proper investigation to determine the genuineness of the allegations and highlighted the pendency of a civil suit regarding the same subject matter.
Delay in lodging an FIR undermines its credibility, and general allegations without specifics can lead to quashing of proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
