Back
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
M. Satya Prakash, S/o. Devasahayam – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Principal Secretary – Respondent
ORDER :
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. The brief case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was initially appointed as District Panchayat Officer on 09.02.1998 in Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department till 2007. Thereafter, he was appointed as C.T.O on 19.01.2007 and later he was promoted as Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in the year 2013 and further his post was redesignated as Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.
4. While the petitioner was working as District Panchayat Offi
Protracted disciplinary proceedings without valid justification, especially post-acquittal in criminal cases, constitute harassment and must be quashed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for equal treatment of delinquents in disciplinary proceedings and the adverse impact of delay in concluding disciplinary actions, ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
