SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1532

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
VALLAM SHOBHAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
B. S. HARISH – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

T. Mallikarjuna Rao, J.

1. Aggrieved by the Award and Decree dated 02.08.2012 in M.V.O.P. No.600 of 2009 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Anantapur (hereinafter will be referred to as ‘Tribunal’), the claimants filed this appeal questioning the correctness of the Tribunal’s Award in not fastening the liability on the 2nd respondent/Insurance company.

2. For convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as per their rankings in the M.V.O.P.

3. The claimants/appellants filed a petition U/s.163-A of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (hereinafter will be referred to as ‘Act’) for compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-on account of the death of Vallam Narasimhulu (hereinafter will be referred to as 'deceased') who died in a Motor vehicle accident.

4. The claimant's case is that on 17.04.2009, the deceased boarded the auto-rickshaw bearing No.AP02-TRAB 6644 at Kadiri, along with five passengers, when it reached Weavers colony Saraswathi Vidya Mandir while the auto was proceeding on the extreme left side of the road, the lorry bearing No.KA-21-A-1764 (hereinafter will be referred to as ‘offending vehicle') came fr

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top