Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Bulipe Lova Eswara Rao AT Lokesh Kuar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Respondent. By its Secreta – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri V.V.L.N. Sarma, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri D.M. Vidya Sagar, Ld. Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development appearing for the Official Respondents.
2. The prayer sought in the present Writ Petition is as under:
SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONERS:
3. The facts in brief as averred in the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition are that a sum of Rs.45,00,000/- was sanctioned under the National Rural Drinking Water Coverage
Community interest prevails over individual concerns in public projects, and unsubstantiated objections do not merit judicial intervention.
Swachha Bharat Mission - Claim entitlement to land - When the Plaintiff does not have title to C.T.S. merely on basis of lay out, it cannot claim entitlement to land where old toilet block existed wh....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State to hold and manage communal properties, such as water bodies, for the benefit of the community. The judgment also emphasizes ....
Construction on land designated as pond is prohibited by law, and unchallenged resolutions by local authorities supersede prior approvals.
since no modalities have been set forth for such use. It is clear that as on date, there is no clear-cut protocol as to who will control the utilization of the building or the community purposes for ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
