VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Tadiboina Parvathi – Appellant
Versus
Dabbakuti Padmavathi – Respondent
ORDER :
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[in short ‘Cr.P.C’] is preferred by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in S.C.No.412 of 2018 on the file of the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Repalle,[In short, ‘trial court’] registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860[in short, ‘I.P.C.’].
2. Petitioners herein are the mother and father of Accused No.1 and Respondent No.1 is the mother of the deceased in the above case.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:
Shabbir Hussain v. State of M.P. (2021) 17 SCC 807
M.Mohan v. Valmurugan & another AIR 2011 SC 1238
State of Haryana and others v. Bhajanlal and others AIR 1992 SC 604
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be a positive act or instigation by the accused; mere refusal to allow entry into the matrimonial home is insufficient.
In matrimonial disputes, vague allegations against relatives cannot sustain charges under IPC; specific evidence of instigation or aid is required for abetment of suicide.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to establish continuous harassment, instigation, and mens rea for the offence of abetment of suicide under Sec. 306 of IPC.
Abetment to suicide under IPC Sections 306 and 498A necessitates proof of instigation or influencing behavior, requiring thorough examination in trial; mere allegations do not suffice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of mens rea and direct or active instigation for the offence of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC. The judgment also emphasizes....
To establish an offence under Section 306 IPC, specific evidence of instigation or intent to aid suicide is essential; absent such evidence, proceedings can be quashed.
The offence of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires a direct involvement of the accused in the commission of suicide and that the acts or omissions of the accused must be proximate, con....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the scope and ambit of Section 107 IPC and its correlation with Section 306 IPC were discussed, emphasizing the need for direct or indirect ac....
For abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or aiding the act, which was not established in this case.
Denial of marriage does not constitute abetment of suicide under IPC without clear evidence of instigation or aiding the act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.