IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
Betha Mahalakshmi, W/o. Late Kona Srinivasa Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
The State Bank Of India, Rep By Its Branch Manager and Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.5967 of 2024
Decided On : 03-09-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, and 300 A - Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Section 45ZA(2) - Writ petition filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus against bank for disbursement of amounts lying in deceased's accounts - Court held that the petitioner, as class-I legal heir, is entitled to receive amounts as per succession certificate issued by the Court - The bank's inaction in disbursing the amounts was arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights. (Paras 1, 9, 15)
(B) Succession Certificate - Legal heirs' rights - The court recognized the right of livelihood as a human right under Article 21, emphasizing the need for immediate financial assistance to the bereaved family. (Paras 9, 15)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, wife of the deceased, claimed disbursement of amounts from the bank after obtaining a succession certificate, while the respondent No.2, sister of the deceased, claimed as nominee. The bank refused to disburse the amounts citing the nomination.
Findings of Court:
The petitioner is entitled to receive the amounts lying in deceased's bank accounts, with apportionment among all class-I legal heirs as per the succession certificate.
Issues: The main issue was the entitlement of the petitioner to the amounts in light of the nomination and succession certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the bank must honor the succession certificate and disburse the amounts accordingly, recognizing the rights of legal heirs over the nominee's claim.
Result: Writ petition allowed, directing the bank to release the amounts within two weeks.
ORDER :
(Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.)
This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
2. The petitioner herein is wife of the deceased and the respondent No.2 is sister of the deceased. The deceased while working as teacher died on 07.03.2020 leaving the petitioner herein and two (02) minor children as class-I legal heirs and respondent No.2 herein and another sister as class-II legal heirs. While so, the deceased opened one savings bank account bearing No.32450965366 with SBI Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram District wherein an amount of Rs.50,000/- is lying as credit amount and the petitioner also deposited an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- as fixed term deposit with the bank vide For bearing Nos.32451110819, 32451116606, 32451117350 and 32451148662 at respondent No.1/bank. After death of the deceased, the petitioner herein being class-I legal heir submitted a representation to the respondent/bank claiming disbursement of amount lying in the deceased bank account. Similarly, respondent No.2 being a class-II legal heir also submitted a representation to the respondent/bank claiming disbursement of amount, since she was nominated as nominee to the fixed deposits. In view of the claim and counter claim by the petitioner and respondent No.2, the respondent No.1/bank neither disbursed the amount nor disposed of their representations by passing any speaking order and requested to get succession certificate through Court of law. Having no other option, the petitioner herein along with her two (02) minor children filed SOP No.5 of 2020, on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram, seeking right of succession being class-I legal heirs in respect of the deceased wherein the respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein were made as party respondents to the said SOP. Similarly, respondent No.2 also invoked jurisdiction of the Court of law and filed OS No.4 of 2021 on the file of learned II Additional District Court, Parvatipuram seeking declaration of title in respect of properties bequeathed by the deceased, wherein the petitioner herein is defendant to the said suit. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court below passed order dated 17.11.2021 granting succession in favour of the petitioner by holding as under:
Whereas the petitioners applied on 21st day of October, 2020, by invoking Sec.372 of Indian Succession Act, praying the court to issue Succession Certificate in their favour, in respect of the schedule mentioned amounts lying with State Bank of India, Main Branch, parvatipuram, relating to the deceased Kona late Srinivasa Kumar, S/o. Late Sitaramamurthy.
SCHEDULE
An amount of Rs.50,000/- in SB A/c.32450965366; and an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- in fixed deposits (totaling to Rs.20,50,000/-) lying with State Bank of India, Main Branch, Parvatipuram. The petition is allowed directing the office to issue Succession Certificate in
The court affirmed that a succession certificate grants legal heirs entitlement to deceased's bank deposits, overriding nominee claims under the Banking Regulation Act.
A nominee does not inherit the estate of the deceased and must distribute amounts to legal heirs according to succession laws.
Nomination does not confer ownership rights; legal heirs retain entitlement to the deceased's estate under succession laws.
Nominees do not inherit the estate of the deceased; they must distribute amounts to legal heirs according to succession laws.
A nominee under Section 45ZA of the Banking Regulation Act has the right to receive funds, but these funds remain part of the deceased's estate and are subject to succession laws.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.