SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1287

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, HARINATH N.
U. V. Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Arrabolu Sai Naveen
For the Respondent: Maheswara Rao Kuncheam.

ORDER :

(R. Raghunandan Rao, J.)

The learned Arbitrator appointed for resolution of the disputes between the petitioners and the sole respondent had passed an award in favour of the sole respondent for a sum of Rs.32,99,625/- along with interest @ 10% p.a. with costs to the sole respondent in Arbitration Case No.309 of 2014. The sole respondent sought execution of the said award by moving Arbitration Execution Petition No.151 of 2017 before the Learned Principal District Judge, East Godavari District.

2. The petitioners herein objected to the proceedings before the Learned Principal District Judge, East Godavari District on the ground that the execution petition had been filed to realize an amount of Rs.46,46,965/- and the same could not have been filed before the Learned Principal District Judge as it is only the Commercial Court at Visakhapatnam which would have jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

3. The learned Principal District Judge, East Godavari District, by an order dated 31.01.2024 had held that the objection raised in relation to the jurisdiction is not maintainable as the limit for such jurisdiction to be conferred on the Commercial Court was Rs.1,00,00,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top