Back
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Erukula Yadaiah Goud – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since these Criminal Petitions are filed, under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail, by different accused i.e. Crl. Pet. No. 9252 of 2023 (filed by A2), Crl. Pet. No. 9302 of 2023 (filed by A.1) and Crl. Pet. No. 9314 of 2024 (filed by A3) in same crime viz. Cr. No. 48/1/6/2023/NCB/SUB-ZONE/HYD, they are being taken up together for disposal by way of this Common Order.
2. The above crime was registered against the Petitioner and others for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 22(c), 28 & 29 of NDPS Act.
3. The Prosecution’s case, in brief, is that on 05.06.2023, the Intelligence Officer of the Union of India’s NCB received information regarding the manufacturing of a large quantity of Alprazolam in the production block of CPR Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. in Atchuthapuram APSEZ, Rambilli Mandal. Acting on this information, the Intelligence Officer, along with mediators, found A.1 to A.3 at the production block, where they were packing materials in drums. Subsequently, 119.5 kgs of light yellow powder, suspected to be Alprazolam, were seized from the drums, along with equipment, in the presence of the laboratory owner, under the NDPS Act. A.1 to A.3 co
The court held that the provisions of the NDPS Act apply alongside the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires clear grounds for believing the accused is not guilt....
The stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail and the admissibility of call data as evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
