Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
P. Indeevar, S/o. Late P. Chinnapa Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare – Respondent
ORDER :
(SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J.)
Challenging the proceedings dated 30.08.2024 issued by respondent No.3 terminating the services of the petitioner as Joint Executive officer, the above writ petition is filed.
2. Facts in brief, as per the writ affidavit, the Government introduced a scheme i.e. ‘Arogya Andhra Pradesh’ with an endeavour to provide quality healthcare to the poor. The Government, for effective implementation of the scheme, formed respondent No.2-Trust, under the Chairmanship of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh. Respondent No.3 is the executive authority of the Trust. A paper publication was issued on 28.06.2019 for filling up the post of Joint Executive Officer (Dental) (for short ‘JEO’). The petitioner, after undergoing the selection process, was appointed as JEO on a contract basis, for one year. The petitioner was responsible for multiple dental clinics and approval of claims raised under the scheme, for further approval by his seniors, including respondent No.3. The petitioner’s services were renewed every year and the petitioner’s term was completed on 24.07.2024. However, the petitioner’s services were continued with an assurance that regular renewal proc
Termination of contractual employment must adhere to principles of fairness and non-arbitrariness, ensuring equal treatment under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The termination of services should be made by the appointing authority, and proper opportunity of hearing must be provided before making a decision with serious implications.
The contract-based employment does not entitle the employee to the protections of Article 311, thus allowing termination based on performance without a full departmental inquiry.
The termination by an incompetent authority is invalid, and the competent authority plays a crucial role in employment decisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondents must act fairly and justly, conduct a fair inquiry, and adhere to the principles of fair-play, good conscience, and natural ju....
There is no termination order but only a relieve order is passed by the respondents on 01.02.2014 on completion of the contractual engagement period of two years.
Point of Law : Rule 7 of the Rules 1999 provides detailed procedure for imposing major punishment in case of confirmed employees, and if that is allowed to be given a go by that would frustrate the v....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
