Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI, CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Dsivisional Railway Manager, Vijayawada Division, SCR, Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
Kattem Prashanth Kumari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. This appeal was filed with CMA (SR) No.43696 of 2010 alongwith IA No.1 of 2010 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. After IA No.1 of 2010 was allowed condoning the delay, thePresent appeal was numbered as CMA No.715 of 2024.
2. Heard Sri Mallampalli Srinivas, learned Central Government Counsel for the appellants and Sri S. Raja Bhogendra Nath, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. No representation for respondent Nos.4 & 5.
3. The appellants have filed this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , 1925. The challenge is to the grant of Succession Certificate, vide order, dated 02.12.2009 in SAOP No.8 of 2008 on the file of the learnedPrincipal District Judge, Ongole, in favour of thePresent respondents, to an extent as in the said order,Partly allowing the saidPetition.
4. The SAOP No.8 of 2008 was filed by the respondents 1 to 3 herein, impleading the respondent Nos.4 & 5 and the appellants 1 & 2 herein (respondents 3 & 4 in SAOP). The succession certificate wasPrayed under Section 372 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , in respect of a sum of Rs.5,74,048/- (P.F. Assets amount of Rs.3,09,385/-, C.G.I.S., amount of Rs.37,2
Entitlement to family pension and succession benefits granted to the second wife, affirming her legal status as a widow under applicable pension rules, despite the opposition from children of the fir....
Nominee status can impact succession claims; both marriages considered in succession certificate decision despite first marriage's validity.
A second marriage during the subsistence of a first marriage is void, and nomination does not confer legal heir status.
Important Point : A marriage during the subsistence of a valid marriage is void, and nomination for benefits does not grant legal heir status to the nominee.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Rule 116(6) of the Pension Rules and its application to determine the entitlement of widows and children to the family pensio....
A succession certificate obtained without notifying all legal heirs and through misrepresentation is subject to revocation under the Indian Succession Act.
Family pension payable to legal representative of deceased does not need a Succession Certificate, even if it were a debt belonging to deceased – Family pension is an independent claim and cannot be ....
A Succession Certificate cannot be revoked through a separate original petition; it must be pursued as a miscellaneous application under the Indian Succession Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
