SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
M. Lakshminarayana – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondent
WP No.31179 of 2017
Decided on : 20-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. Sai Rama Murthy
For the Respondent: Government Pleader for Mines and Geology (AP), Government Pleader for Assignment (AP), Government Pleader for Revenue (AP)

Cancellation of mining lease without notice violates principles of natural justice; the court will not intervene when administrative processes are pending.

Headnote:(A) Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Principles of Natural Justice - Writ petition challenging the cancellation of a Quarry lease without notice - The petitioner claimed the cancellation was illegal and arbitrary. The 4th respondent issued a renewal of mining lease, and the petitioner claimed continued operations. The respondents asserted violations of mining operations and that proposals for lease cancellation were pending. Interim directions were previously issued to allow continued operations until a decision on the lease was made. The court observed that the lease period had expired in 2021, and the matter could not be decided on merits. (Paras 1-10)

(B) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - The court clarified that it will not interfere unless merits exist to uphold claims made. (Paras 1, 9)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging the cancellation of a Quarry lease of 15.00 acres without notice, despite the lease being granted for 20 years. The respondents claimed the lease was cancelled due to violations of the Mining Rules and because the area was needed for a Tribal University.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the expiration of lease and pending decisions from mining authorities on lease cancellation; therefore, no merits exist to adjudicate further on the matter.

Issues: The main issues addressed were legality and procedural adherence in the cancellation of the Quarry lease without proper notice and justification for violations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that since the lease had expired and further administrative actions were unresolved, it could not rule on the legality of the cancellation at this moment.

Result: Writ petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges cancellation of lease. (Para 1 , 2)
2. interim directions allow operations pending lease status. (Para 3)
3. arguments regarding lease violations presented. (Para 4 , 6 , 7)
4. court considers interim orders and lease expiration. (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
5. writ petition dismissed with no costs. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :

    "....to issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in cancelling the Quarry lease of an extent of Acs.15.00 cents situated in Sy.No.1/8 of Relli Village, Kothavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram District, without notice is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent to follow due process of Law before initiating any action and to pass..."

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, by Proceedings No.429/M1/2000, dated 27.01.2001 the 4th respondent issued granting of first renewal of mining lease for Quartz over an extent of Acs.15.00 cents in Sy.No.1/8 of Relli Village, Kothavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram District for a period of 20 years subject to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957 and conditions laid down in Form-K prescribed under M.C. Rules, 1960 and additional conditions stipulated to the annexure appended to the grant order. Subsequently on 18.07.2017 the 4th respondent also stated that, he has already sent proposals for cancellation of Quarry lease to the District Collector and therefore, the 4th respondent has stated that, he has cancelled the lease without issuing any notice to the petitioner. Questioning the action of the 4th respondent in cancelling the lease without issuing notice to the petitioner and violating principles of natural justice, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. This Court vide order dated 14.09.2017, while issuing Rule Nisi, has granted interim direction in WPMP No.38852 of 2017, reads as under :

    "WVMP No.38852 of 2017

    There shall be interim direction as prayed for unless and until the lease of the petitioner is cancelled or modified. It is further made clear that this order will not preclude the respondents from proceeding in accordance with law."

4. The counter-affidavit has been filed by 3rd respondent. While denying all the allegations made in the petition, inter alia, contended that, this respondent has submitted proposals vide Lr.No.429/M1/2000 dated 23.08.2017 to the Director of Mines and Geology, Ibrahimpatnam to cancel the Quarry lease held by Sri M. Lakshminarayana for Quartz over an extent of 15.00 Acres in Sy.No.1/8 of Relli Village, Kot Mandal, Vizianagaram District. Regarding construction, it was recommended by the Tahsildar, Kothavalasa in view of establishment of Tribal University; also the lessee violated certain breaches as mentioned above and also subject to satisfaction of A.P.M.M.C. Rules, 1966. Geology, Ibrahimpatnam. The orders are awaited from the Director of Mines and Geology. It is stated that, the petitioner has been granted 1st renewal of Mining Lease for Quartz over an extent of 15.00 Acres in Sy.No.1/8 of Relli Village, Kothavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram District for a further period of 20 years vide G.O. Ms. No.425, dated 03.08.2000. The 1st renewal lease deed was executed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Vizianagaram on 27.01.2001 for a further period of 20 years w.e.f. 12.02.2001 to 11.02.2021 and issued work orders vide Proceedings No.429/M1/2000, dated 27.01.2001. The lease will be in force upto 11.02.2021, but since 12.07.2012 the petitioner is not taking dispatch permits which indicate that there is no mining operations in the subject lands as there are no environmental clearances. Accordingly action was initiated for violation of various rules liable for conciliation of lease. In addition to the above, The Tahsildar, Kothavala

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top