Back
NYAPATHY VIJAY
Reddam Satyanarayana Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Angada Satyanarayana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present revision is filed questioning the judgment dated 05.07.2011 in CMA No.27 of 2009 passed by Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, East Godavari District, Rajahmundry confirming the order dated 10.08.2009 passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry in EA No.52 of 2008 in EP No.28 of 2007 in OS No.1283 of 2004.
2. Brief facts : The petitioner is the judgment debtor. A suit OS No.1283 of 2004 was filed for recovery of money and the same was decreed on 14.06.2005. For realization of the decretal amount, the schedule property was auctioned on 02.09.2008 in EP No.28 of 2007. The petitioner then filed EA No.52 of 2008 under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC to set-aside the auction, as he had paid the decretal amount of Rs.45,000/- to the respondent No.1 towards full and final satisfaction of the decretal amount. A full satisfaction memo dated 12.09.2008 was filed into Court on 31.10.2008 by the decree holder. The above application was filed before confirmation of sale by the Court.
3. The respondent No.1/decree holder did not file any counter. The respondent No.2/auction purchaser filed his counter opposing the application and had contended that the s
Poundage under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC can be paid after a sale is set aside, not necessarily within 60 days, allowing the application to set aside the auction to be considered.
An auction purchaser cannot claim ownership or additional payments until the auction sale is confirmed, and the 5% penalty only applies to actual amounts deposited as per CPC provisions.
The failure to submit the required stamp duty within the stipulated time does not invalidate a court sale, as the title to the property vests in the auction purchaser upon confirmation of the sale, a....
The limitation for filing an application under Order XXI Rule 89 CPC is sixty days, not thirty, and stay orders do not exclude this period.
The final opportunity for the judgment debtor to save the property by setting aside the sale before confirmation under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC can be filed with the consent of the judgment debtor's related party and the required amount must be....
The limitation for filing an application under Order XXI Rule 89 CPC is 60 days from the date of sale, and the stay period does not save the limitation.
Auction sale of property – Non-compliance of mandatory provisions can vitiate auction sale of property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
