Krishna Bisai vs Union of India - 2025 Supreme(AP) 499

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(AP) 499

VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Krishna Bisai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Devalaraju Anil Kumar

Table of Content
1. challenge against unlawful loan recovery methods. (Para 1 , 3)
2. legal obligations of banks regarding loan recovery. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court mandates compliance with rbi guidelines. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's decision to dispose of the writ petition. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs :

"to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 11 for resorting to illegal methods for recovery of amounts from the petitioner without following due process of law as arbitrary, without jurisdiction, ex facie illegal against Articles 19, 21 & 300-A of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the respondent Nos.3 to 11 for violating the procedure of law for recovery of amounts due from petitioner by consequently restraining the respondent Nos.3 to 11 from resorting to any illegal methods for recovery of amounts from the petitioner without following due process of law for recovery of the amounts due from the petitioner and to pass such o