SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1562

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Allu Arjun – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Y. Nagi Reddy
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT /ORDER :

A movie star and a former Member of Legislative Assembly who are arraigned as A1 and A2 respectively filed this criminal petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS )/ Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash F.I.R. in Crime No.71 of 2024 of Nandyal II Town Police Station, Nandyal District registered for the offence punishable under Section 188 I.P.C.

2. Heard arguments of Sri Y. Nagi Reddy, the learned Counsel for petitioners and Sri K. Sandeep, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.

3. Perused the record.

4. The following point falls for consideration :

    "Whether registration of F.I.R. by police for the offence punishable under Section 188 I.P.C. and permitting the investigation agency to proceed further would be abuse of the process of the Court or would defeat the ends of justice requiring interference of this Court?

Point :

5. Sri Y. Nagi Reddy, the learned Counsel for petitioners cited the statute and the precedent and contended that the very registration of F.I.R. is in violation of the statute and the precedent and therefore, the same shall be quashed. The learned Counse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top