IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. Manmadha Rao, J.
Pedamallu Srinivasulu Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondent
WP No.6020 of 2023
Decided On : 18-10-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for mining lease transfer (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government's denial of lease transfer (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments for and against lease transfer (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's scrutiny of lease transfer application (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT / ORDER :
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief :
"..... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the respondents in not transferring of mining lease to the petitioner duly paying the transfer of Mining lease application fee of Rs.2,500/- vide Ch.No.5219, dated 29.01.2004 of STO, Nellore for Mica, Quartz, Feldspar, and Vermiculite over an extent of Acs.26.60 cents in Sy.Nos.181 and 182 of Inkurthy Village, Podalakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, basing on Memo No.47126/R3-1/2010, dated 07.12.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and Letter No.5069/M2/90, dated 04.03.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to transfer of mining lease on the name of the petitioner duly paying the transfer of Mining lease application fee of Rs.2,500/- vide Ch.No.5219, dated 29.01.2004 of STO, Nellore for Mica, Quartz, Feldspar and Vermiculite over an extent of Acs.26.60 cents in Sy.Nos.181 and 182 of Inkurthy Village, Podalakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District basing on Memo No.47126/R3-1/2010, dated 07.12.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent and Letter No.5069/M2/90, dated 04.03.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent...."
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner intends to take Mining Lease in respect of Survey Nos.181 and 182 to an extent of Acs.26.60 cents situated at Inukurthi Village, Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District by way of transfer from Mr. S.V. Maheedar Reddy (for short "the lease holder"), S/o. Venkata Krishna Reddy in favour of the petitioner, after giving an amount of Rs.20,000/- as consideration towards previous development charges of said Mica Mine. The lease holder has executed a letter on the non-judicial stamps paper to the then Secretary, Industries and Commerce (Mines-II) Department, Hyderabad on 28.07.2023 for transfer of mining lease to the petitioner duly paying the transfer of Mining lease application fee of Rs.2,500/- vide Ch.No.5219, dated 29.01.2004 of STO, Nellore, for Mica, Quartz, Feldspar and Vermiculite over an extent of Acs.26.60 cents in Survey Nos.181 and 182 of Inkurthy Village, Podalakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. While so, the 2nd respondent passed a Memo No.47126/R3-1/2010, dated 07.12.2010 stating that Mines and Mineral Lease for Mica, Quartz, Feldspar and Vermiculite over the subject land held by Mr. S.V. Maheedar Reddy to transfer in favour of the petitioner and stated that the lease holder is requested to re-submit the transfer proposals after obtaining the valid approved Mining Plan from the lessee. The lease holder requested for transfer of Mining Lease held by him over the subject area in favour of the petitioner, as he was unable to perform the Mining operations. But the respondents have not considered the transfer of the Mining lease application so far. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. The 3rd respondent filed counter-affidavit denying all the allegations made in the petition. It is further stated in the counter-affidavit that the Government vide G.O. Ms. No.697 of Industries and Commerce (M.I) Department, dated 28.07.1976 have granted a Mining Lease for Mica over an extent of Acs.26.60 cents in Survey Nos.181 and 182 of Inkurthy Village, Podalakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, for a period of 20 years in favour of Mr. S.V. Maheender Reddy and the same was executed vide Proceedings N
AI
The court found the mining lease transfer application ineligible due to failure to comply with legal requirements, notably the absence of an approved mining plan as mandated by law.
The cancellation of the mining lease was found to be in accordance with the statutory provision of Rule 25(5) of the Orissa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004.
Point of law: An application for the renewal for a prospecting licence shall be disposed of by the State Government before the expiry of the period of prospecting licence and if the application is no....
The issuance of a mining lease without affording adequate opportunity for a hearing violates principles of natural justice.
Delay in registration of mining lease transfer due to unavoidable circumstances, such as a partner's quarantine, warrants judicial consideration and cannot justify revocation of permission.
Mining Lease approvals were revoked due to the petitioners' failure to comply with statutory requirements, rendering prior approvals void.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.