Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Nyapathy Vijay
Krishnaveni Wire Knitting Industries – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corp Hyd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdictional basis for appeal under the act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on the appellant's business and operational difficulties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. failures in compliance by the appellant with the esi act and subsequent proceedings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. inspection findings contradicting appellant's claims of non-operation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. trial court issues and evidence consideration. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 6. arguments regarding operational status of appellant's business. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. final conclusion on the erroneous nature of the trial court's order. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Nyapathy Vijay, J.
The present Appeal is filed under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short ‘the Act’) against the Order in EIC.No.18 of 2005, dated 25.03.2011 passed by the Employees Insurance Court and Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-1 at Hyderabad.
2. The Appellant herein is the Petitioner in the EIC.No. 18 of 2005.
3. The facts leading to filing of the present Appeal are as follows:-
The Appellant/Petitioner is a proprietary concern, which was started in the year 1978 and is involved in the manufacture of wiring products
The court found the initial order erroneous due to misreading evidence, confirming the Appellant’s non-liability under the Employees State Insurance Act after business seizure.
The liability to pay E.S.I. contribution and interest is determined by the effective date of the notification and the adjudication of the actual amount payable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the joint and several liability of the transferee and the transferrer under Section 93A of the Employees State Insurance Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a subsequent transferee may not be liable for belated payment of contribution under the ESI Act if there is no mens rea on their part, and the....
Belated payment of contribution - Payment of contribution under the ESI Act is a statutory liability and the ESI Corporation has no power to grant waiver
Failure to challenge assessment orders under the ESI Act precludes the petitioner from contesting subsequent recovery proceedings, affirming that exclusive statutory remedies must be pursued.
A determination order under Section 45A of the ESI Act is mandatory before issuing recovery notices for omitted wages, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting the alternative statutory remedies provided under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 before seeking judicial inte....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
