SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 590

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Gollavilli Borraiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of charges and sentencing (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on legal application of sections 357(1) and 357(3) cr.p.c. (Para 12 , 13)
3. clarification of legal distinction in compensation applications (Para 15 , 16)
4. final order and directions for reconsideration (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER:

Heard Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners/A-1 to A-4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice for the State.

2. Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners/A-1 to A-4 were found guilty for the offence U/s.447 r/w.34 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months each, and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) each, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month each. Further, the petitioners/A-1 to A-4 found guilty for the offence U/s.427 r/w.34 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two (02) years each, and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for two months each. Further, A-1 to A-4 are directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh only) each to P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top