Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Boyapati Srinivasa Appa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Durga Malleswara Educational Society (registered) – Respondent
ORDER :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
Heard Sri B.Adinarayana Rao, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri Sri K.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Considering the nature of the impugned order and the order proposed to be passed, the notice to the respondent is dispensed with, however, the interest of the unrepresented respondent would be kept in view.
3. This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC has been filed challenging the docket order dated 17.07.2025 passed in E.A.No.70 of 2012 in E.P.No.44 of 2012 in O.S.No.109 of 2001 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Vijayawada. The docket order dated 17.07.2025 reads as under:
“Heard and perused the record. The main execution petition is filed for execution of LokAdalath Award. The present EA is filed to hold the award is null and void and unenforceable on the ground of playing fraud against the petitioner herein.
Whereas the main EP is filed for execution of the Lok Adalath Award, as the petitioner herein sought for the said Award null and void and unenforceable on the ground of playing fraud towards him, a detailed enquiry has to be conducted to determine the real question in controversy. Unless
A Lok Adalat award is binding when signed by parties, challenges must follow strict procedural paths under Articles 226/227, and the Execution Court's failure to address preliminary objections is an ....
A Lok Adalat award can be challenged by filing a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India on limited grounds, and a civil suit is not maintainable to challenge a Lok Adalat aw....
Objection to execution of decree – Statutory finality attached to Lok Adalat award leaves no room for appellate or plenary civil remedy against the award treated as a decree – Award may be executed a....
The award of Lok Adalat is final and binding, challengeable only through writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227, not in Civil Court.
The Lok Adalat exceeded its jurisdiction by making a non-party to the original suit a party and failing to provide a fair hearing, violating the Legal Services Authority Act.
Lok Adalat has no jurisdiction in the matters of appointment of guardian of a minor as it involves the determination of the welfare of the minor with the proposed guardian, keeping in view various fa....
Point of Law : Challenge to the award of Lok Adalat can be done only by filing a writ petition under Article 226 and/or Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the High Court and that too on very....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
