IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Ravi Nath Tilhari, Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, JJ.
Magapu Satyanaratyana - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, General Administration (SC-I) Department and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 13785 of 2025
Decided On : 18-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the detention order and grounds for detention. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner and government regarding the necessity of detention. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
Heard Sri S. V. Maruthi Sankar, learned counsel, representing Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti, learned Government Pleader, attached to the Office of the Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondents.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for writ of Habeas Corpus to set aside the Order of detention dated 03.05.2025 baring Ref.No.M1/521904/2025 passed by the 2nd respondent-The Collector & District Magistrate, East Godavari District with respect to the petitioner’s wife Smt. Polisetti Laxmi (in short ‘the detenue’) and to set her free. During the pendency of the writ petition, the detention Order was confirmed by the State/1st respondent vide G.O.Rt.No.1206 dated 20.06.2025, served to the petitioner on 28.06.2025. By way of amendment, the petitioner has challenged the G.O.Rt.No.1206 dated 20.06.2025 as well.
I Facts:
3. By the detention Order, the detenue was detained on the ground that she is ‘bootlegger’ as defined under Section 2 (b) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (in short ‘the Act 1986’), as she was repeatedly indulging in committing offenses of possession, supply and sale of illicitly distilled liquor in contravention of Section 7(B) read with Section 8 (B) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act 2020’) to prevent her from acting in any manner prejudicial to maintenance of public health and public order.
Detention Order by District Collector:
4. The detention Order passed by the 2nd respondent-the Collector & District Magistrate, East Godavari District, dated 03.05.2025, is reproduced as under:
“File No.REVEG-MAGL0M1(PRED)/7/2025-JA(MAGL-1)-COL-RJY-EG
Ref.No.M1/521904/2025
Date: 03/05/2025
Collector’s office
East Godavari
District
Rajamahendravaram
Proceedings of the Collector & District Magistrate, East Godavari
District, Rajamahendravaram
Present:- Smt. P. Prasanthi, I.A.S.,
***
ORDERS OF DETENTION
UNDER SECTION 3(1) & (2) R/W SECTION 2(b) OF THE Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (ACT No.1 OF 1986)
Read: 1. Govt. Circular Memo.No.106/Law & Order/A3/2014-1 (General Administration (Law & Order) Department), Dated:
29.10.2014.
2. G.O.Ms.No.18, General Administration (Law & Order) Department, Dated: 02.03.2015.
3. G.O.Rt.No.486, General Administration (SC.I) Department, Dated: 07.03.2025.
4. R.C.No.L/101/DPEORJVM/2025, Dt. 02.05.2025, of the District Prohibition and Excise Officer, East Godavari District, Rajamahendravaram.
Whereas, as per the information laid before me by the District Prohibition & Excise Officer, East Godavari District, Rajamahendravaram, which reveals that, one individual Smt. Polisetti Laxmi, W/o. Kondayya, A/53 yrs, C/Settibalija, R/o. Ayyappanagar, Rajamahendravaram Urban, East Godavari District is repeatedly indulging herself in clandestine possession, supply & sale of illicitly distilled liquor in contravention of Section 7(B) read with 8 (B) of A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2020. She indulged in bootlegging activities in the manner prejudicial to the public health and public order and she has involved in
05 cases.
Whereas, the following 05 cases are considered as grounds for her detention under the above act.
| Sl.no | Cr. No. & Date | I.D.Liquor seized |
| 1 | Cr.No.220/2024, dated 22.03.2024, under Section 34 (a) of A. P. Excise (Amendment) Act 17 of 2020 and 7-B r/w. 8-B of A. P. Proh.(Amendment) Act of 2020 of SEB Station, Rajamahendravaram South | 55 liters of ID Liquor and 8 bottles of IMFL |
| 2 | Cr.No.389/2024, Da | |
Preventive detention under the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act requires the authority to demonstrate necessity due to repeated offenses impacting public health, not merely due t....
(1) Preventive Detention - Recourse to preventive detention can be taken by executive merely on suspicion and as a precaution to prevent activities by person, sought to be detained, prejudicial to ce....
(1) Preventive Detention - Power of preventive detention is qualitatively different from punitive detention - An order of preventive detention, may be made before or during prosecution - Pendency of ....
A detention order must demonstrate subjective satisfaction with detailed grounds, especially regarding the detenu's bail status, to be legally valid.
The main legal point established is that preventive detention cannot be a substitute for ordinary law and must be exercised with caution, ensuring that the detention is extremely necessary and the ac....
The detention order must be based on a case where the person has become a threat and menace to society, disturbing the whole tempo of the society and putting the entire social apparatus in disorder. ....
Preventive detention requires clear evidence of the likelihood of release and necessity for detention; vague assertions are insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.