Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B V L N Chakravarthi
Jaibuni Munisha Begum – Appellant
Versus
U Lakshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants are disputing a trial court's ruling on permanent injunction based on possession. (Para 1 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. the court addresses arguments regarding evidence related to possession and the validity of agreements. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 3. legal implications of lis pendens and its effect on property rights are discussed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. final outcome of the appeal is stated. (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
This Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants/defendants No.1, 2 and 4 under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 , assailing the decree and judgment, dated 28.09.1999, passed in A.S.No.10 of 1992 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, at Anakapalle.
PLEADINGS:
4. The suit in O.S.224/1984 on the file of Prl.District Munsif, Anakapalle, was instituted seeking the relief of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff, over the plaint schedule property.
6. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaint schedule property belongs to Smt.Padathala Appala Narasama; she executed a sale agreement on 08.07.1981 in favour of the plaintiff; later delivered possession of the plaint schedule prop
The decree in a previous suit remains binding and under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, the transfer of property during pending litigation does not affect rights to the property after the....
The doctrine of lis pendens applies to subsequent purchasers; their rights are subordinate to those of the decree holder in a specific performance case.
The doctrine of lis pendens does not affect prior subsisting rights, allowing innocent purchasers to enforce their claims based on preceding agreements.
(1) Lis Pendens – Section 52 of T.P. Act has no application where transfer in favour of subsequent purchaser is not after filing of suit but before filing of suit for specific performance.(2) Resista....
A pendente lite purchaser cannot assert independent title in execution proceedings, as the doctrine of lis pendens prevails over claims of bona fide purchasers under the Specific Relief Act.
Subsequent purchasers will be bound by lis pendens.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
