SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1582

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. Suresh Reddy, B V L N Chakravarthi, JJ.
Shaik Jalaluddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP Rep PP – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No: 282 of 2016
Decided On : 14-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G Vijaya Saradhi
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

The court established that acts committed in the heat of passion without premeditation constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, emphasizing reliance on credible dying declarations despite claims of contradictions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC is set aside; he is convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder instead - The court found that the act was committed in the heat of passion without premeditation, thus establishing it as culpable homicide under Part II - The dying declarations of the deceased were held credible and consistent, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite claims of tutoring; the appellant's arguments regarding inconsistency were dismissed. (Paras 11-18)

Facts of the case:
The appellant alleged to have beaten the deceased suspecting her fidelity and subsequently set her ablaze on the night of 5/6.05.2009, resulting in her death weeks later. Multiple witnesses corroborated the deceased’s dying declarations, which were recorded by police and magistrate.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the prosecution established the appellant's culpability under Section 304 IPCA for committing the act without premeditation and in a fit of rage.

Issues: The key issue was whether the prosecution successfully proved the guilt of the appellant for murder or if it constituted culpable homicide.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of premeditation and the nature of the act qualified it as culpable homicide not amounting to murder, affirming the authenticity of dying declarations and dismissing claims of contradictions in testimony.

Result: Appeal partly allowed; conviction altered to Section 304 IPC with a sentence of seven years.

Table of Content
1. factual background of marriage and abuse. (Para 3)
2. incident details indicating alleged offense. (Para 11 , 12)
3. evaluation of dying declarations' credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
4. determining degree of culpability. (Para 18)
5. final conviction of the appellant. (Para 19)

JUDGMENT:

B.V.L.N.Chakravarthi, J.

1. Heard Sri G.Vijaya Saradhi, learned counsel for the appellant/accused No.1 and Sri S.Dushyanth Reddy, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

2. The appeal is filed by the appellant/accused No.1 aggrieved by the judgment dated 01.02.2016 passed in S.C.196/2010 on the file of the learned IV Addl.District & Sessions Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.

3. The facts as culled out from the evidence of prosecution witnesses are as under:

(i) The appellant/accused No.1 and Smt.Sk.Shakira (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) are husband and wife; their marriage was solemnized on 17.05.1998; out of their wedlock, they blessed with one son and one daughter; the appellant/A-1 went to Saudi Arabia; he returned to India two years prior to the date of offence; Smt.Sk.Julekabee (A-2) is the mother of A-1; Smt.SyedBibijan (A-3) is the sister of A-2; A-2 and A-3 instigated A-1 to demand Rs.1,00,000/- from the deceased; the accused No.1 to 3 were harassing the deceased, demanding additional dowry.

(ii) On the intervening night of 5/6.05.2009 at about 01.00 a.m. A-1 came to the house in intoxicated condition; A-1 beat the deceased suspecting her fidelity; the deceased questioned A-1 about his conduct; A-1 grew wild, beat the deceased indiscriminately, dragged her to the corner of the kitchen, poured kerosene and set her on fire in the presence of children; the deceased raised cries; A-1 immediately tried to put off the flames, pushed her into a water tub; on hearing cries of the deceased, ShaikGhouse Basha (P.W-6) and others came to the house of accused; they found the deceased with burn injuries; the deceased was shifted to Praja Vydyasala (hospital) belonging to Dr.N.Prabhakar Naidu (P.W-10); later shifted to Charitha Sree Hospital, Vijayawada on 07.05.2009; on intimation from hospital, Sri P.D.S.Prasad, Head Constable of Police of Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada, (P.W-8) visited the hospital and recorded statement of deceased (Ex.P-4); it was forwarded to Kavali Police Station; III Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, (P.W-11) on receipt of requisition from the hospital, visited the hospital and recorded dying declaration of deceased (Ex.P-5); Sub Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Kavali, (P.W-14) on receipt of Ex.P-4, registered a case in Cr.No.75/2009 for the offence U/s.498-A and 307 of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’) vide Ex.P-9 and submitted copies to all concerned; he visited Charitha Sree Hospital at Vijayawada, examined the deceased and recorded her statement.

(iii) Sub Inspector of Police also examined Shaik Shareef (P.W-2), Shaik Baji (P.W-4) and others and recorded their statements; he obtained copy of dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate; on 08.05.2009 he visited scene of offence i.e., house of accused No.1 and deceased situated in Ishakmiyavari Street, Kavali and prepared scene observation report (Ex.P-10) and rough sketch (Ex.P-11) in the presence of P.W-9 and another mediator; he examined Shaik Ghouse Basha (P.W-6), Md.KouserJohn (P.W-7) and others and recorded their statements; he seized M.O-1 burnt clothes, M.O-2 cloth pieces having skin peeling, M.O-3 broken bangle pieces, M.O-4 water plastic can, M.O-5 partly burnt mixer, M.O-6 burnt plastic hair bonds, M.O-7 partly burnt combed hair and M.O-8 towel at the scene of offence.

(iv) Further investigation was conducted by the Inspector of Police, Kavali (P.W-15); on receipt of information about death of deceased on 23.05.2009, he came to Vijayawada, visited the hospital; he secured witnesses Mohammed Shaheeda (P.W-3), Shaik Ghora Babu (P.W-5) and others and recorded their statements; inquest was conducte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top