IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. Suresh Reddy, B V L N Chakravarthi, JJ.
Shaik Jalaluddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP Rep PP – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No: 282 of 2016
Decided On : 14-03-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of marriage and abuse. (Para 3) |
| 2. incident details indicating alleged offense. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. evaluation of dying declarations' credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. determining degree of culpability. (Para 18) |
| 5. final conviction of the appellant. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT:
B.V.L.N.Chakravarthi, J.
1. Heard Sri G.Vijaya Saradhi, learned counsel for the appellant/accused No.1 and Sri S.Dushyanth Reddy, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.
2. The appeal is filed by the appellant/accused No.1 aggrieved by the judgment dated 01.02.2016 passed in S.C.196/2010 on the file of the learned IV Addl.District & Sessions Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
3. The facts as culled out from the evidence of prosecution witnesses are as under:
(i) The appellant/accused No.1 and Smt.Sk.Shakira (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) are husband and wife; their marriage was solemnized on 17.05.1998; out of their wedlock, they blessed with one son and one daughter; the appellant/A-1 went to Saudi Arabia; he returned to India two years prior to the date of offence; Smt.Sk.Julekabee (A-2) is the mother of A-1; Smt.SyedBibijan (A-3) is the sister of A-2; A-2 and A-3 instigated A-1 to demand Rs.1,00,000/- from the deceased; the accused No.1 to 3 were harassing the deceased, demanding additional dowry.
(ii) On the intervening night of 5/6.05.2009 at about 01.00 a.m. A-1 came to the house in intoxicated condition; A-1 beat the deceased suspecting her fidelity; the deceased questioned A-1 about his conduct; A-1 grew wild, beat the deceased indiscriminately, dragged her to the corner of the kitchen, poured kerosene and set her on fire in the presence of children; the deceased raised cries; A-1 immediately tried to put off the flames, pushed her into a water tub; on hearing cries of the deceased, ShaikGhouse Basha (P.W-6) and others came to the house of accused; they found the deceased with burn injuries; the deceased was shifted to Praja Vydyasala (hospital) belonging to Dr.N.Prabhakar Naidu (P.W-10); later shifted to Charitha Sree Hospital, Vijayawada on 07.05.2009; on intimation from hospital, Sri P.D.S.Prasad, Head Constable of Police of Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada, (P.W-8) visited the hospital and recorded statement of deceased (Ex.P-4); it was forwarded to Kavali Police Station; III Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, (P.W-11) on receipt of requisition from the hospital, visited the hospital and recorded dying declaration of deceased (Ex.P-5); Sub Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Kavali, (P.W-14) on receipt of Ex.P-4, registered a case in Cr.No.75/2009 for the offence U/s.498-A and 307 of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’) vide Ex.P-9 and submitted copies to all concerned; he visited Charitha Sree Hospital at Vijayawada, examined the deceased and recorded her statement.
(iii) Sub Inspector of Police also examined Shaik Shareef (P.W-2), Shaik Baji (P.W-4) and others and recorded their statements; he obtained copy of dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate; on 08.05.2009 he visited scene of offence i.e., house of accused No.1 and deceased situated in Ishakmiyavari Street, Kavali and prepared scene observation report (Ex.P-10) and rough sketch (Ex.P-11) in the presence of P.W-9 and another mediator; he examined Shaik Ghouse Basha (P.W-6), Md.KouserJohn (P.W-7) and others and recorded their statements; he seized M.O-1 burnt clothes, M.O-2 cloth pieces having skin peeling, M.O-3 broken bangle pieces, M.O-4 water plastic can, M.O-5 partly burnt mixer, M.O-6 burnt plastic hair bonds, M.O-7 partly burnt combed hair and M.O-8 towel at the scene of offence.
(iv) Further investigation was conducted by the Inspector of Police, Kavali (P.W-15); on receipt of information about death of deceased on 23.05.2009, he came to Vijayawada, visited the hospital; he secured witnesses Mohammed Shaheeda (P.W-3), Shaik Ghora Babu (P.W-5) and others and recorded their statements; inquest was conducte
Dandu Lakshmi ReddyVs. State of A.P.
Jayamma and another Vs. State of Karnataka
The court established that acts committed in the heat of passion without premeditation constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, emphasizing reliance on credible dyi....
Dying declarations must be coherent and trustworthy, free from influence to be valid for conviction; inconsistencies lead to benefit of doubt.
Where there are more than one statement in the nature of dying declaration, one first in point of time must be preferred. Of course, if the plurality of dying declaration could be held to be trustwor....
The reliability and relevance of dying declarations, the presumption under Section 113(A) of the Indian Evidence Act, and the need for corroboration in the presence of inconsistencies.
Evidentiary reliability of dying declarations affirms conviction; inconsistencies favor acquittal.
Dying declarations can constitute sole evidence for conviction if found voluntary and truthful; the burden of proof for alibi rests solely with the appellant.
A conviction based on inconsistent dying declarations is unsafe without corroborative evidence; discrepancies create reasonable doubt undermining the prosecution's case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for caution in relying on dying declarations, the importance of corroborative evidence, and the entitlement of the accused to the benef....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.