ORDER :

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR, J.

Invoking revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 39 of BNSS (Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure), the convict preferred this revision with a prayer as mentioned below:

“It is therefore pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set-aside the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.383 of 2019 on the file of the Hon'ble IV-Additional District and Sessions Judge Court at Kakinada confirming the judgment dated 24.10.2019 in C.C.No.125 of 2017 on the file of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada in the interest of Justice.”

2. Respondent No.1 is State. Respondent No.2 is the de facto complainant.

3. Sri Y.Chakradhara Raj, the learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri A.Sai Rohit, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Sri T.Ramakoteswara Rao, the learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted their arguments.

4. Facts leading to the present revision have to be seen. A woman by name Smt. Kottala Rajya Lakshmi was taking treatment in Government General Hospital, Kakinada as an in- patient. Her husband is Sri Seelu Agneya Raju @ Kottala Agneya R