Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
D.S. Yasoda – Appellant
Versus
M.K.Ponnuswamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and procedural overview of revision petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. representation and hearing of parties in court. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on admissibility of unregistered partition deed. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. claims of coparcener rights under hindu succession act. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. defendants' position regarding prior partition. (Para 9) |
| 6. legal standards for admissibility of unregistered documents. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. final order allowing the revision petition. (Para 13) |
ORDER:
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J.
1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 14.02.2020 in O.S.No.151 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati.
2. Vide the order under Revision, an unregistered deed of declaration of partition deed was received in evidence for collateral purposes. The petitioner herein filed suit against the respondents herein for partition of plaint schedule properties and for separate possession. When the suit was fixed for evidence of the 2nd defendant, an unregistered deed of declaration of partition dated 25.03.1993 was sought to be marked on behalf of the 2nd defendant, upon an objection
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
