Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B KRISHNA MOHAN
V. Prakash, S/o. Late Smt. V. Suseelamma – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP, rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petition concerning regulatory endorsement of land claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents to consider petitioner's representations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petitioners seek modification of prohibited list. (Para 8) |
| 5. court directs expeditious consideration of applications. (Para 9) |
| 6. writ petitions disposed; no order as costs. (Para 10) |
Order :
B. KRISHNA MOHAN, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondent Nos.4 and 5 in W.P.No.11615 of 2020.
2. Similarly, heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the official respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondent Nos.8 to 10 in W.P.No.36984 of 2022.
3. The unofficial respondent No.4 in the 1st case is the 1st petitioner in the 2nd case along with the 2nd petitioner, who is not a party to the 1st writ petition. The 1st petitioner in the 1st case is the 8th respondent in the 2nd case along with the other respondent Nos.9 and 10, who are not parties in the 1st writ pe
The court emphasizes that administrative actions regarding property must await the resolution of pending appeals to ensure fairness and legal compliance.
The court underscored adherence to procedural due process in property classification matters under the Registration Act.
Court emphasized discouraging frivolous litigation by imposing exemplary costs on parties making misleading claims, clarifying occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act.
The court emphasized adherence to due process, underlining that the burden of proof rests on parties and endorsing disposed applications without court permission is a procedural anomaly.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
