Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
NINALA JAYASURYA, TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
B. Pedda Subba Reddy, S/o. B. chinna Seshi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Special Deputy Collectorcumland Acquisition Officerla, Srbc, Nandyal,Kurnool District – Respondent
Judgment :
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the Common Order dated 27.09.2006 in L.A.O.P No.290, 291, 292, 293, 294 and 295 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judtge, Nandyal.
2. The appellant herein is the respondent/claimant in the O.P No.294 of 2000.
3. Heard Mr.M.Lakshminarayana, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S Bala Mohan Rao, learned Government Pleader for appeals. Perused the material on record.
4. For the purpose of borrow area for C.N.S. soils, the Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, SRBC, Nandyal, acquired lands of the appellant and others of an extent of Ac.28.66 cents in Survey Nos.218 and 219 situated in Thammarajupalle village.
5. Section 4 (1) Notification under the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) was published in the A.P.Gazette on 15.03.1999 and a Draft Declaration under Section 6 of the Act was also published simultaneously. After conducting enquiry, the Land Acquisition Officer passed Award No.22/98-99 dated 29.03.1999. Though the appellant/claimant claimed compensation @ Rs.1,50,000/- per acre, the Land Acquisition Officer after taking sale statistics of 19 transact
The court established that compensation for acquired land must reflect market value, considering relevant sale transactions, time gaps, and necessary deductions, reaffirming the principle that claima....
Market value for compensation must reflect actual conditions and potential of the land, based on comparable sales, excluding speculative advantages from acquisition schemes.
![Bodapatla Lachaiah vs The Land Acuision Officr [Spl.Deputy Collector] - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 55953](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Telangana_2.png)
While considering the just compensation payable to a land holder, it is not necessary that the Court should confine fixing of compensation based on the compensation actually sought by the claimants a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
