SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 241

K.J.SHETTY
N. S. SUBBA RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S.PUTTASWAMY, M.Rama Jois

( 1 ) N. S. Subba, Rao the petitioner-is a village accountant. In this petition under Art. 226, he complains about the discrimination made in the pay scale given to him with effect from 1-1-1970.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are these. The petitioner was appointed as a Village Accountant in the year 1843 under the provisions of the Mysore village Offices Act, 1908. The said Act was repealed by the Mysore; Village offices Abolition Act, 1961. Thereafter the Mysore General Services revenue Subordinate Branch Recruitment Rules, 1961 were framed under the proviso to Art. 309 of the Constitution. By the said Rules, provision was made for the recruitment of village accountants. Qualification fixed for the direct recruitment was a pass in SSLC Examination. The said qualification wag relaxed in respect of persons who had already served as Village accountants under the MVO. Act, 1908. For them, it was sufficient, if they have passed VIII Standard and were within 50 years of age.

( 3 ) THE petitioner continued to draw the caid scale of pay till it was lage Accountants. The petitioner was one of applicants. He had passed only VII Standard but he had enough experience in the Office. He was,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top